Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!cs.utexas.edu!rice!uupsi!sunic!kth.se!perand
From: perand@admin.kth.se (Per Andersson)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: Board Level Ethernet/TCP/IP Products
Message-ID: <1991Jun30.214202.2558@kth.se>
Date: 30 Jun 91 21:42:02 GMT
References: <1991Jun10.201046.16912@sctc.com>
Organization: Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
Lines: 20

In article <1991Jun10.201046.16912@sctc.com> smith@sctc.com (Rick Smith) writes:
>CMC --
>
>It was obvious from my mail that CMC is well known. I also got responses
>from CMC employees on the Net. The general form of non-employee messages
>was "We tried them two years ago, their protocol software was buggy, and
>they didn't fix things very fast." I passed this perception along to
>the guys at CMC. They said their software has vastly improved in the
>past couple of years.......

Anyone have actual experience with CMC boards in an Internetlike environment?
Folks at work have started using CMC instead of Excelan board for some reason,
and there are some strange problem with default router, arps and such going on,
which wasn't a problem with the Excelan board? The router is Cisco btw.

/Per
-- 
Per Andersson (perand@admin.kth.se, perand@stacken.kth.se)
Now working at Bofors Electronics, managing networks,
still reading news at the Royal Institute of Technology