Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!mcsun!ukc!mucs!mccuts!zzassgl
From: zzassgl@uts.mcc.ac.uk (Geoff Lane)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.acorn
Subject: Relative Merits of RiscOS Pascals?
Message-ID: <2938@mccuts.uts.mcc.ac.uk>
Date: 27 Jun 91 11:22:21 GMT
Organization: Manchester Computing Centre, Manchester, England, M13 9PL
Lines: 13

I've had it with C (and don't want to discuss it :-)).

There appears to be only two Pascal compilers for RiscOS, the Cambridge
Pascal from Dabs Press and the ISO-Pascal from Acorn.  Apart from the
obvious price advantage in favour of the Cambridge Pascal (around 20
quid) are there any other conciderations that must be made?

Can anyone give us a quick summary of how each compiler can cope with
implementing a Wimp Application?

-- 
Geoff. Lane.                                  Janet: zzassgl@uk.ac.mcc.uts
UTS Sys Admin, Manchester Computing Centre, Oxford Rd, Manchester, M13 9PL