Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!spool.mu.edu!agate!ucbvax!pasteur!cory.Berkeley.EDU!navas
From: navas@cory.Berkeley.EDU (David C. Navas)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Subject: Re: De-macification of the Amiga (Re: The Amiga's Future)
Message-ID: <14268@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: 25 Jun 91 18:01:47 GMT
Article-I.D.: pasteur.14268
References: <1991Jun23.201625.18225@news.iastate.edu> <1991Jun23.204705.23687@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu> <51086@ut-emx.uucp> <1991Jun24.100035.29314@Sugar.NeoSoft.com> <1991Jun25.053133.671@neon.Stanford.EDU>
Sender: news@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: navas@cory.Berkeley.EDU
Lines: 14

In article <1991Jun25.053133.671@neon.Stanford.EDU> torrie@cs.stanford.edu (Evan Torrie) writes:
>  Geez.  I didn't think the CBM Pet, or the C-64 had multitasking.  Guess
>Commodore screwed up royally on those, huh?

I am very grateful that Cmdre came into Amiga Corp.'s life late in the game,
or we would have had another C64.  As it is, management has been loathe to
fire people who only know how to sell game machines and hire someone who
knows how to sell a "real" computer.  But there you go.

Draw you own conclusions about your question :)

David Navas                                   navas@cory.berkeley.edu
	2.0 :: "You can't have your cake and eat it too."
Also try c186br@holden, c260-ay@ara and c184-ap@torus