Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!mips!pacbell.com!ucsd!nosc!baron!ryptyde!dant
From: dant@ryptyde.UUCP (Daniel Tracy)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Subject: Re: YOU PEOPLE HAD BETTER GET WIT THE PROGRAM!! (Was: Re: Commodore Business Machines)
Message-ID: <126@ryptyde.UUCP>
Date: 26 Jun 91 10:45:30 GMT
References: <1991Jun24.131045.4403@news.iastate.edu> <1991Jun24.150701.1686@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> <14248@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> <1991Jun24.221816.22164@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu>
Reply-To: dant@ryptyde.UUCP (Daniel Tracy)
Organization: Ryptyde Timesharing (ryptyde.cts.com)
Lines: 14

Responding to the following:

"So you are saying the simple fact that the clipboard
isn't used means that it sucks? Well then, the Amiga sucks. The
Amiga isn't used much in the U.S., so it must be terrible."
 
Hmmmm. Okay, I guess I can agree with that. :-)
 
Sorry, I just couldn't resist. I'm a Mac fanatic. Although I consider Macs
generally superior, the Amiga does have some very interesting points. The
chipset must have been incredible in its day. The kernel still is, not in
features (I hate Amiga users that chant "Pre-emptive multitasking"), but
in efficiency. Now just imagine a Mac with that kernel...(Sculley calling
his lawyers)