Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!caen!uwm.edu!psuvax1!news
From: melling@cs.psu.edu (Michael D Mellinger)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Subject: Re: Please learn how to followup(was: What to buy??(numbercruncher)
Message-ID: <rn6H7wn$@cs.psu.edu>
Date: 28 Jun 91 00:50:56 GMT
References: <1991Jun17.124116.1900@sugar.hackercorp.com> <63@ryptyde.UUCP>
	<4ocHh98?@cs.psu.edu> <106@kas.helios.mn.org>
Sender: news@cs.psu.edu (Usenet)
Organization: Penn State Computer Science
Lines: 19
In-Reply-To: rhealey@kas.helios.mn.org's message of 26 Jun 91 14: 25:47 GMT
Nntp-Posting-Host: sunws5.sys.cs.psu.edu


In article <106@kas.helios.mn.org> rhealey@kas.helios.mn.org (Rob Healey) writes:

   In article <4ocHh98?@cs.psu.edu> melling@cs.psu.edu (Michael D Mellinger) writes:
   >In article <63@ryptyde.UUCP> dant@ryptyde.UUCP (Daniel Tracy) writes:
   >>>>>   "Even the IIfx isn't as fast as a 3000/25."
   >   That's bull. The IIfx will blow the 3000 away. It has two dedicated I/O
   >   chips (SCSI DMA too, which can be used with Unix), and a killer graphics
   >   coprocessed board (the 8-24GC) (which was released with the IIfx). I doubt
   >   you've done any kind of serious benchmarks.
   >

    [Response deleted]

He fool!  It looks like you are responding to me.  There isn't any
part of any of my messages in your followup.  Please try to more
accurate.

-Mike