Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!cunixf.cc.columbia.edu!cunixb.cc.columbia.edu!es1 From: es1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Ethan Solomita) Subject: Re: Amiga bashing Message-ID: <1991Jun29.161209.3959@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> Sender: usenet@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (The Network News) Nntp-Posting-Host: cunixb.cc.columbia.edu Reply-To: es1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Ethan Solomita) Organization: Columbia University References: <1151@stewart.UUCP> <1991Jun25.123841.1186@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu> <1162@redford.UUCP> Date: Sat, 29 Jun 1991 16:12:09 GMT In article <1162@redford.UUCP> jerry@redford.UUCP (Jerry Shekhel) writes: > >Too bad the Amiga does not have adequate resolution for GUI's. Believe >me, at the lower resolutions, VGA does quite well as far as screen updates >go. > Hmm. I guess NeXT also has a real problem, since both machines work at 1024x1024 with 4 grey-scales. -- Ethan FF buckets of bits on the bus, FF buckets of bits. Take one down, Short it to ground, FE buckets of bits on the bus.