Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!uwm.edu!csd4.csd.uwm.edu!gblock From: gblock@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Gregory R Block) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy Subject: Re: CDTV News Message-ID: <13636@uwm.edu> Date: 30 Jun 91 19:47:19 GMT References: <1991Jun30.092929.22762@news.iastate.edu> Sender: news@uwm.edu Reply-To: gblock@csd4.csd.uwm.edu Lines: 47 Originator: gblock@csd4.csd.uwm.edu From article <1991Jun30.092929.22762@news.iastate.edu>, by barrett@iastate.edu (Barrett Marc N): > Remember, 24-bit is a superset of 12-bit. This means that the CD-I > machines (for instance) can display color at least as well as an Amiga. > They can spectacularly blow the Amiga away if you start using sophisticated > processing algorithms on CD-I as well. Neither graphic art, nor the human eye, is as linear as you think. And this IS ntsc we're talking about. DCTV isn't 24bit, it's only got about 4 mil onscreen, and then the luminance transitions are faster than the actual color transitions. And it would probably look better than a 24bit RGB, simply because it's pure NTSC. The bits aren't there, but you see my point. It's not linear. > Bob the Consumer won't know what 12-bit and 24-bit mean. However, Bob > the Consumer does have *EYES* and will be able to tell the differences > between the 24-bit CD-I and the inferior 12-bit CDTV/Amiga when the two > are shown next to each other. Not on your average TV... And CDTV looks better than I thought it would. Far better. I had expected Amiga graphics, and they didn't look like Amiga graphics. I can't explain it, but they didn't seem the same. It was on a TV I was viewing it on, and it did look good. Have you ever seen CDTV? No. :-) > BTW, it amazes me how much Amiga users are suddenly comfortable with > inferior technology. Way back when the Amiga was brand-new, the attitudes > of MAC people -- that they would accept inferior technology simply because > it came from Apple -- drove Amiga users mad. Now, the Amiga users are > accepting inferior Amiga technology simply it is from Commodore. Okay. Now you can hold on. Who the hell ever said they were COMFORTABLE???? I'd love 8bit graphics. I don't want a 24bit graphic chipset. It's a bad idea. That's for graphic boards to handle, and for DIG to deal with, IMHO. What is needed now is an 8bit graphic chipset to compare directly with VGA. Argh. And what the hell do you want me to do? Design my own chipset? Pay me, and I will. :) I can see using a nice 4x4x4 tower as my new Denise. :D Greg -- Socrates: "I drank WHAT????" LMFAP: "Next time you see me, it won't be me." Wubba: "A dream is nothing more than a wish dipped in chocolate and sprinkled with a little imagination." (From my poem, "A Dream") -Wubba