Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!sample.eng.ohio-state.edu!purdue!haven.umd.edu!uflorida!reef.cis.ufl.edu!jma From: jma@reef.cis.ufl.edu (John 'Vlad' Adams) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc Subject: Re: Amiga BBS software Message-ID: <29465@uflorida.cis.ufl.EDU> Date: 29 Jun 91 22:18:32 GMT References: <7512@vela.acs.oakland.edu> <1991Jun26.191046.15484@NCoast.ORG> Sender: news@uflorida.cis.ufl.EDU Organization: UF CIS Dept. Lines: 21 In article <1991Jun26.191046.15484@NCoast.ORG> davewt@NCoast.ORG (David Wright) writes: > You can say that again. Most of the "doors" are written in Arexx, >and extremely slow. Some are so slow that people usually think the system has >locked up because it takes 20 or 30 secs for them to start doing anything. >And example code for doors written in "C" is pretty scarce. But in any case, >C-Net is *MUCH* cleaner and better written than Paragon/StarNet. Funny, AREXX doors on my BBS don't take 20 seconds to load. They start immediately upon execution. Mind telling me, or giving me one bloody example of how C-Net is much cleaner and better written that StarNet? I run StarNet. I get FIDO messages directly without running doors. I support FREQs. I am in two networks (Fido and EggNet) and can be in at least seven more networks. I have the ability to support multiple lines. My system doesn't crash unless I run a poorly written door, or program not related to the BBS. -- John M. Adams --*****-- Professional Student /// Internet: jma@cis.ufl.edu Genie: vlad /// Only the Amiga Sysop of The Beachside, Amiga Support, StarNet BBS \\V// Makes it Possible Fido Net 1:3612/557. 904-492-2305 (Florida) \X/