Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!kawakami@ocf.berkeley.edu From: kawakami@ocf.berkeley.edu (John Kawakami) Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: RE: Possible GCR sale... What is the real value of a Spectre GCR Summary: I'm only considering a sale, not actually selling yet. Message-ID: <42482@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> Date: 27 Jun 91 00:08:15 GMT Sender: nobody@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Distribution: usa Organization: :noitazinagrO Lines: 47 I recently posted a short message asking if $300 is too much for a GCR. It seems that it is actually not much to charge. However, I have to apologize to everyone who offered to buy it, as I am still just thinking about selling it. If I decide to sell it, I will hold an auction later in the summer. ************************************************************************* Things to think about re the Spectre GCR. * Mac ROMS are very expensive now. $250+ now. This means fewer sales for the Spectre which means that GBS must focus on other products to produce revenue. * System 7.0 does not work on Spectre now. It probably will eventually, knowing the way Dave Small works his magic. But the new System will probably not be as compatible as 6.0.3 is for a while. * On the plus side, a Spectre on a TT or SST030 is a cheap alternative to a Mac II. * If you have a full blown mono ST system with a memory upgrade and a hard drive with free space, this is a cheap way to become a Mac. If you need to get a hard drive or a ram upgrade kit, the price of "going mac" gets expensive fast (GCR needs 1 meg and a floppy, but 2 megs and ten megs of hard disk are closer to a usable minimum configuration.) The Mac Classic under the educational discount is under $1000 (I'm not sure how much) and it has full compatiblilty as well as giving you another CPU to hack on (sometimes it's very handy to have two machines). * There is no SuperDrive for the GCR. On the other hand, all disk accesses are faster than most macs' disk accesses. # The GCR is usually very good to me. It rarely ever crashes (under System 6.0.5) and has let me run Microsoft Word 4.0, which seems to be a popular standard around campus. I also did some programming work on it. It is a useful tool. However, it is not as disk compatible as Dave Small would have you believe: it failed on the two drives I was using. One was a late model TEAC, the other was an NEC (which is popular with 3rd party disk makers for some reason). The TEAC never worked right, the NEC was hacked/fixed with instructions by Small. It is supposed to do Mac disks correctly with other 3rd party disk drives. ************************************************************************ John Kawakami kawakami@ocf.berkeley.edu ucbvax!ocf.berkeley.edu!kawakami