Xref: utzoo comp.os.vms:40448 comp.sys.dec:6190
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!unix.cis.pitt.edu!dsinc!ub!acsu.buffalo.edu
From: kalisiak@acsu.buffalo.edu (christophe m kalisiak)
Newsgroups: comp.os.vms,comp.sys.dec
Subject: was Re: ... DEQNA on ... (V5.4), is now 'apology'
Message-ID: <81391@eerie.acsu.Buffalo.EDU>
Date: 27 Jun 91 03:40:28 GMT
References: <1991Jun26.193102.1541@spcvxb.spc.edu>
Sender: news@acsu.Buffalo.EDU
Followup-To: comp.os.vms
Organization: SUNY Buffalo
Lines: 23
Nntp-Posting-Host: lictor.acsu.buffalo.edu


In article <1991Jun26.193102.1541@spcvxb.spc.edu> terry@spcvxb.spc.edu (Terry Kennedy, Operations Mgr.) writes:
>In article <81349@eerie.acsu.Buffalo.EDU>, kalisiak@acsu.buffalo.edu (christophe m kalisiak) writes: 
>> So, thanks for all the useful advice on the DEQNA, people. NOT!
>
>  I'm glad you found it helpful to discard the advice from people on the
>net who wanted to help you at no cost. Please avoid bothering us with
>questions you already know the answers to in the future. If I should hap-
>pen to forget that a posted question came from you, please do me the favor
>of ignoring it.


I wanted to take a minute to formally apologize for my tone. I guess it
was just the realization that the board did work under 5.4 after all
that got me a little excited...

BTW, I didn't really know the 'answer' until I found out today. I was
planning on getting a DEQNA anyway because the upgrade route from QN->LQ
is much cheaper than buying a new (even used) DELQA...

Again, sorry if I might have offended anyone...

Chris