Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sample.eng.ohio-state.edu!purdue!haven.umd.edu!umbc3.umbc.edu!umbc5.umbc.edu!chuck
From: chuck@umbc5.umbc.edu (Chuck Rickard; ACS (UGRAD))
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: Most Incompatable PC (Was:  What's wrong, Keen or Tandy?)
Message-ID: <1991Jun27.013816.18211@umbc3.umbc.edu>
Date: 27 Jun 91 01:38:16 GMT
References: <15716@ccncsu.ColoState.EDU> <1991Jun26.135427.1531@husc3.harvard.edu>
Sender: newspost@umbc3.umbc.edu (News  posting account)
Organization: University of Maryland Baltimore County
Lines: 16

In article <1991Jun26.135427.1531@husc3.harvard.edu> chandoni@husc6.UUCP (John-Marc Chandonia,Biophysics,,34954) writes:

>> Lest we not forget the Leading Edge (Model D, I believe)
>
>Huh?  I had one of these for 4 years, and never had any problems.
>The case was to small to put in a 386 motherboard (not to mention
>the integrated ports and such), but as an XT clone it never had
>any compatability problems!

I think it may have been the Model M (the one with the huge case!) that had
the problems.  They went to the smaller sized case in the Model D.

-- 

Chuck Rickard
(chuck@umbc5.umbc.edu)