Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!batcomputer!caen!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ncar!midway!linac!att!cbnewsj!drv
From: drv@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (dennis.r.vogel)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: Gateway 2000 Query
Keywords: problems, purchasing
Message-ID: <1991Jun28.172002.20055@cbnewsj.cb.att.com>
Date: 28 Jun 91 17:20:02 GMT
References: <2781@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us> <1991Jun28.144701.17724@devildog.att.com>
Distribution: usa
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 21

In article <1991Jun28.144701.17724@devildog.att.com>, jdalin@devildog.att.com (Jimmy Dalin) writes:
> There was an active Gateway thread several months ago.  The letters were
> running about 3-1 or 4-1 negative to positive.  There was a common feeling
> that Gateway's quality had slipped somewhat in recent months.  A friend and
> ...
> 
> Jim Dalin

I guess everyone can have their good days and theor bad days, but
I gotta put in a positive word here.  I purchased a Gateway 2000/33
back in January.  I forget how long it took to get it but it wasn't
near the 7-8 weeks quoted in this article.  It arrived exactly on the
day they said it would (they called 2 or 3 days prior, i.e., when it
was shipping, with the date).  Everything worked fine right out of
the box.  I continue to be satisfied with it to this date.

I have no association with Gateway other than as a satisfied customer.

Dennis R. Vogel
AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lincroft, NJ