Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!convex!bcm!lib!thesis1.med.uth.tmc.edu From: jsorenso@thesis1.med.uth.tmc.edu (JEFFREY MARIUS SORENSON) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware Subject: Fastest Mac FP Setup? Message-ID: <5146@lib.tmc.edu> Date: 24 Jun 91 23:51:43 GMT Sender: usenet@lib.tmc.edu Distribution: usa Organization: University of Texas Medical School at Houston Lines: 33 Nntp-Posting-Host: thesis1.med.uth.tmc.edu Originator: jsorenso@thesis1.med.uth.tmc.edu The lab I'm working for wants to get a Mac to run some floating-point calculation intensive simulations (with a friendly interface of course). What is the fastest combination available? I'm guessing that a ][fx with a Radius Rocket is the fastest dynamic duo. Is there a faster combination? Other concerns: 1. I read a posting here about the '040 that said FP operations on the '040 require a 256K block of code to translate floating point instructions for the '030 to the corresponding '040 instructions. Is this the case? If so, is this necessarily a run-time translation or are there utilities to let you recompile your code so that the translation need only be done once. Along these lines, are there ANY compiliers/utilities for that let you exploit the floating point power of the '040. Does the Rocket come with any such tools? If not, and it is the case that run-time translation must occur, then is the Rocket REALLY 3x faster than a stock ][fx (or only theoretically 3x faster) at floating-point stuff? Is there anyone out there who's played with both a ][fx and a Rocket who could give advice? 2. If there's a Rocket under the hood, is there any advantage (as far as numerical simulations go) to having an fx as opposed to a ci? (wouldn't both CPUs be converted into I/O processors?). Will a Rocket even fit into a ci? 3. Not a major concern, but it would be nice if the machine were sys 7 compatible. I've heard that the rocket is almost there, but will it work at all? Is it just a problem virtual memory and addressing or are there a lot of patches involved? Thanks in advance for any insight. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- jsorenso@thesis1.med.uth.tmc.edu | "No matter where you go, there you are" | -BB -------------------------------------------------------------------------------