Xref: utzoo misc.wanted:15934 comp.sys.mac.wanted:4218 misc.forsale.computers:12426
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!yale.edu!ox.com!heifetz!tbomb!time
From: time@ice.com (Tim Endres)
Newsgroups: misc.wanted,comp.sys.mac.wanted,misc.forsale.computers
Subject: Re: WANTED: Mac SE or Mac II, IIx, IIcx, LC, SI
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 91 15:15:41 EST
Organization: ICE Engineering, Inc.
Message-ID: <1CE00001.i5mm3l@tbomb.ice.com>
Reply-To: time@ice.com
Distribution: usa
X-Mailer: uAccess - Mac Release: 1.5
Lines: 21


In article <1991Jun27.155212.11467@neon.Stanford.EDU>, philip@pescadero.Stanford.EDU (Philip Machanick) writes:
> ? This is the first time I've heard this - rather the opposite (if
> you are upgrading an SE, the SE/30 upgrade is better than most
> accelerators because SCSI is faster). I used to own an SE/30, and
> I wouldn't take an SE instead unless money was really tight. It
> certainly seemed at least as fast as an equivalent IIx/IIcx,
> if not faster because it didn't have to talk NuBus to draw the
> screen.
> 
> Can you substantiate this claim? (Just interested.)
> 

The SE/30 is SUBSTANTIALLY faster the the SE for me.

-------------------------------------------------------------
Tim Endres                |  time@ice.com
ICE Engineering           |  uupsi!ice.com!time
8840 Main Street          |  Voice            FAX
Whitmore Lake MI. 48189   |  (313) 449 8288   (313) 449 9208
-------- USENET: A slow moving self parody.....