Newsgroups: comp.text
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!ists!newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!nexus.yorku.ca!davecb
From: davecb@nexus.yorku.ca (David Collier-Brown)
Subject: Re: Frame vs. Interleaf vs. ?
Message-ID: <1991Jun28.030953.9094@newshub.ccs.yorku.ca>
Sender: news@newshub.ccs.yorku.ca (USENET News System)
Organization: York University
References: <1991Jun20.064303.19790@hermesa.uucp> <1991Jun21.130202.17852@compu.com> <68@tdatirv.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 1991 03:09:53 GMT

  I'm an Interleaf bigot: I found Frame more elegant and faster to learn, but
harder to do difficult things with (like *!#@$@^!!! tables) 
  On a 2/50 (although a 3/6 is far better) I dodn't have any of the printing
or space problems experienced by Pat Alvarado: I think they're port-specific
to the 386 version.  Mind you, I lied to lpr and told it the speed to use
was 38,400...

  And if you want to customize Interleaf, all you have to do is get you systems
admin to give you a lisp procedure in the standard ``desktop'' to allow you
to select your personal version.  Knowing interleaf, its probaly something
like (bang-symlink-on-head-with my-desktop ordinary-desktop (;-))

--dave
-- 
David Collier-Brown,  | davecb@Nexus.YorkU.CA | lethe!dave
72 Abitibi Ave.,      | 
Willowdale, Ontario,  |  Today's featured dish:
CANADA. 416-223-8968  |      Sun-dried alligator.