Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!samsung!uunet!mcsun!ukc!axion!micromuse!micromuse!peter From: peter@micromuse.co.uk (Peter Galbavy) Newsgroups: comp.text Subject: Re: Frame vs. Interleaf vs. ? Message-ID: Date: 28 Jun 91 08:37:11 GMT References: <1991Jun20.064303.19790@hermesa.uucp> <1991Jun21.130202.17852@compu.com> <68@tdatirv.UUCP> Organization: MicroMuse Ltd, London, UK. Lines: 33 pa1@tdatirv.UUCP (Pat Alvarado) writes: >mark@hermesa.uucp (Mark McWiggins) writes: >>My company is evaluating high-end publishing packages. So far we >>have a demo of Frame (which looks great) and the Interleaf rep salivating >>over us; haven't seen his package yet. >>Have you been through this? Which did you pick and why? Are there other >>contenders that we should consider? >I also have evaluated FrameMaker and Interleaf and found that Interleaf >makes it very difficult to maintain. I am using a Sun 386i Workstation >running SunOS 4.0.3 and SunView. My problems with Interleaf began with >the swap space cost, 26MB per WS recommended by Interleaf. I know I shouldn't but: Have you seen Avalon from Elan ? We are the UK distributor, and so this is almost advertising, but I am not the 'expert'. If you want more details contact Elan direct on: (415) 964 2200 or sales@elan.com (I think). >Disclaimer: >My views and opinions are my own and do not represent in any way, >shape or form my employer's. I have no affiliation with either Interleaf >or Frame Technology other than as a customer. ditto. -- Peter Galbavy Tech Support, Micromuse Ltd Phone: +44 71 352 7774 E-Mail: P.Galbavy@micromuse.co.uk