Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!olivea!samsung!caen!spool.mu.edu!cs.umn.edu!uc!apctrc!drd!mark
From: mark@drd.com (Mark Lawrence)
Newsgroups: comp.text
Subject: Re: Frame vs. Interleaf vs. ?
Message-ID: <1991Jun28.170300.20981@drd.com>
Date: 28 Jun 91 17:03:00 GMT
References: <1991Jun21.130202.17852@compu.com> <68@tdatirv.UUCP> <1991Jun28.030953.9094@newshub.ccs.yorku.ca>
Distribution: na
Organization: DRD Corporation
Lines: 11

In article <1991Jun28.030953.9094@newshub.ccs.yorku.ca> davecb@nexus.yorku.ca (David Collier-Brown) writes:
>  I'm an Interleaf bigot: I found Frame more elegant and faster to learn, but
>harder to do difficult things with (like *!#@$@^!!! tables) 

I'm a frame bigot: Frame 3.0 (shipping now for Suns running
Sunview and shortly for platforms running X) reportably 
handles tables with the same aplomb as paragraph formats.

-- 
mark@drd.com
mark@jnoc.go.jp  $B!J%^!<%/!&%i%l%s%9!K(B  Nihil novum sub solem