Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!kithrup!sef
From: sef@kithrup.COM (Sean Eric Fagan)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
Subject: Re: vfork() (was Re: RS6000 questions/comments)
Message-ID: <1991Jun30.071746.10250@kithrup.COM>
Date: 30 Jun 91 07:17:46 GMT
References: <351@devnull.mpd.tandem.com> <889@rufus.UUCP> <19439@rpp386.cactus.org>
Distribution: usa
Organization: Kithrup Enterprises, Ltd.
Lines: 20

In article <19439@rpp386.cactus.org> jfh@rpp386.cactus.org (John F Haugh II) writes:
>As I recall a S/6000 Model 530 produced about 8 or 10
>fork/exits per second, compared to about 45 per second on an Mpulse/XL
>that I was testing for my employer in 1986 (Pinnacle Systems, Inc.,
>Garland TX)
[code deleted]
>I tried it on the 386 here and got 68 per second.  What does your
>S/6000 give you?

Kithrup, a 25MHz '386 running SCO UNIX 3.2v2, got 82.981 fork/exit's per
second.  The RS/6000 at work (I don't know what model, sorry, nor even how
to find that out 8-)), got 153.02 fork/exit's per second.

That's a bit bettern than 8 or 10 per second, I'd say.

-- 
Sean Eric Fagan  | "What *does* that 33 do?  I have no idea."
sef@kithrup.COM  |           -- Chris Torek
-----------------+              (torek@ee.lbl.gov)
Any opinions expressed are my own, and generally unpopular with others.