Xref: utzoo comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d:15642 comp.windows.ms:14274 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!ysub!psuvm!dsb100 Organization: Penn State University Date: Sunday, 30 Jun 1991 12:49:37 EDT From: David Barr Message-ID: <91181.124938DSB100@psuvm.psu.edu> Newsgroups: comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d,comp.windows.ms Subject: CFD: comp.binaries.mswindows (Was: Re: time for a c.b.ibm.pc.windows ) References: <1991Jun28.224447.1228@pinhead.pegasus.com> In article <1991Jun28.224447.1228@pinhead.pegasus.com>, todd@pinhead.pegasus.com (Todd Ogasawara) says: >Has there ever been any discussion about creating a >comp.binaries.ibm.pc.windows news group? [.....] is that with three >So, how do you feel about creating > comp.binaries.ibm.pc.windows >and/or > comp.binaries.ibm.pc.windows.vbasic I love the idea. but I'd much rather stick to a shorter name. I propose: comp.binaries.mswindows I'd say let the vbasic stuff go in mswindows for now, and if it really takes off (i'm not much of a fan for it myself), then newgroup it as well, something like comp.binaries.mswindows.vbasic. (which conveniently allows for other hierarchies). --- David Barr - Penn State CAC Student Consultant, Student Programmer DSB100@psuvm.psu.edu | dsbarr@vivaldi.psu.edu dsbarr@psusun03.psu.edu | ...psuvax1!hogbbs!barrstl!barr