Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!mintaka!spdcc!tauxersvilli!alphalpha!nazgul
From: nazgul@alphalpha.com (Kee Hinckley)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: need information about XVT
Keywords: XVT x-development
Message-ID: <1991Jun27.165141.7560@alphalpha.com>
Date: 27 Jun 91 16:51:41 GMT
References: <1991Jun19.173316.18566@alphalpha.com> <1991Jun21.183405.26015@colorado.edu> <1991Jun24.195803.10980@alphalpha.com> <1991Jun26.204244.29527@solbourne.com>
Organization: none
Lines: 20

In article <1991Jun26.204244.29527@solbourne.com> imp@solbourne.com (Warner Losh) writes:
>In article <1991Jun24.195803.10980@alphalpha.com> nazgul@alphalpha.com (Kee Hinckley) writes:
>>However I am not aware of any
>>virtual toolkits which allow you to take one of those manager widgets
>>(Table comes to mind) and put their "virtual" widgets inside of it.
>
>While it is true that you can't mix OI and Xt, you do have the same
>functionality.  Since OI version 1.1 (released about a year ago) any

True I'm sure.  But OI isn't a virtual toolkit.  It's a toolkit that
supports two style guides.  XVT is a virtual toolkit in the sense that
it is layered on top of other toolkits.
-- 
Alfalfa Software, Inc.          |       Poste:  The EMail for Unix
nazgul@alfalfa.com              |       Send Anything... Anywhere
617/646-7703 (voice/fax)        |       info@alfalfa.com

I'm not sure which upsets me more: that people are so unwilling to accept
responsibility for their own actions, or that they are so eager to regulate
everyone else's.