Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.toronto.edu!ietf-nntp-distribution-owner
From: rsalz@bbn.com (Rich Salz)
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 1991 14:59:28 -0400
Message-ID: <9106251859.AA13525@litchi.bbn.com>
Original-To: tytso@athena.mit.edu
Subject: Re: NEWNEWS
Original-Cc: ietf-nntp@turbo.bio.net, lear@turbo.bio.net, sob@tmc.edu
Newsgroups: list.ietf-nntp
Distribution: list
Sender: list-admin@cs.toronto.edu
Approved: list.ietf-nntp@mail.cs.toronto.edu
Lines:        8

Yeah, I agree that something like
	520 Not enough resources for that command
is something that should be codified in the spec.

It is also tough to keep the difference between the protocol and the
implementation separate -- and not too separate.  Again, I apologize
if I crossed any lines or stepped on anyone's toes.
	/r$