Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!spool.mu.edu!olivea!oliveb!bunker!hcap!hnews!129!90.0!Gary.Petraccaro
From: Gary.Petraccaro@p0.f90.n129.z1.fidonet.org (Gary Petraccaro)
Newsgroups: misc.handicap
Subject: Re: Censored NFB BBS proposal
Message-ID: <16590@handicap.news>
Date: 28 Jun 91 16:11:14 GMT
Article-I.D.: handicap.16590
Sender: wtm@bunker.isc-br.com
Reply-To: Gary.Petraccaro@p0.f90.n129.z1.fidonet.org
Organization: FidoNet node 1:129/90.0 - Post Road Inn, Greensburg PA
Lines: 22
Approved: wtm@bunker.hcap.fidonet.org

Index Number: 16590

[This is from the Blink Talk Conference]

 > JD: Will you be carrying an NFB echo if available? <he inquires with

 > JD: a puzzled look on his face>

     Why wouldn't we.  Hey, we'll even post in that echo just as
we welcome debate from all sides, we expect them to do the same.
I think there users would settle for nothing less.  I certainly
hope that they don't name the echo BLINDTALK, though.  That might
be a tad on the excessively annoying side to many sysops who have
enough to do to keep their boards running smoothly besides having
to cope with such exceedingly close names.  Of course, if it's an
NFB policy echo--for members only, then sysops would be stuck
setting up keys and locks (security codes) and it might get
interesting having to check out the users who ask for access.

--
Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!129!90.0!Gary.Petraccaro
Internet: Gary.Petraccaro@p0.f90.n129.z1.fidonet.org