Xref: utzoo news.admin:15578 news.software.b:8472 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!chinacat!chip From: chip@chinacat.unicom.com (Chip Rosenthal) Newsgroups: news.admin,news.software.b Subject: Re: Articles rejected by C news at ukma Message-ID: <1991Jun27.221243.778@chinacat.unicom.com> Date: 27 Jun 91 22:12:43 GMT References: <1991Jun26.155257.5692@zoo.toronto.edu> <1991Jun26.220203.17522@uunet.uu.net> <1991Jun26.230017.21259@zoo.toronto.edu> Organization: Unicom Systems Development, Inc. Lines: 18 In article <1991Jun26.230017.21259@zoo.toronto.edu> henry@zoo.toronto.edu (Henry Spencer) writes: >Having another pseudogroup for discarded articles is an obvious >possibility, although something has to be done to bound its size and be >selective about what gets included. Why? The stuff that is getting chucked was localized by B news. Note I'm not claiming that because B news did it, C news should. Instead, I'm saying that we've been able to afford the disk space for these messages in the past, and I think we still can. I'm very much in favor of the type of checking C news does, and I have zero qualms about non-conforming articles being chucked. I just wish the location they were chucked into wasn't the bit-bucket. -- Chip Rosenthal 512-482-8260 | Closed user interfaces for open systems? Unicom Systems Development | No, thank you. | Boycott Lotus Development Corp.