Xref: utzoo news.software.b:8487 news.software.readers:102 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!twg.com!david From: david@twg.com (David S. Herron) Newsgroups: news.software.b,news.software.readers Subject: Re: Future of USENET Message-ID: <9197@gollum.twg.com> Date: 28 Jun 91 16:34:32 GMT References: <1991Jun25.111720.17920@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG> <21eHwfd$@cs.psu.edu> Followup-To: news.software.b Organization: The Wollongong Group, Palo Alto, CA Lines: 37 In article <21eHwfd$@cs.psu.edu> flee@cs.psu.edu (Felix Lee) writes: >We're currently at 20M of news a day in 1200 newsgroups. Three years >ago it was 4M/day and 400 newsgroups. > >I'd like to propose 1G/day and 100 000 newsgroups as a target for >normal operation in some future news system. Start designing now. Hmm.. part of the design has to be a fat enough wire leading to my home. A quick calculation | 1 - boomer:david --> bc scale=3 1000000000/24 41666666.666 ./60 694444.444 ./60 11574.074 Says the wire will need to handle over 100Kbits-per-second all day long. Hmm.. up til now my TB+ seemed pretty capable of the job. Sigh.. if only I were Rob Pike AT&T would be willing to pay for T1 lines to the house, ohwell. ;-) ISDN doesn't cut it -- it's only 56Kbaud. But then it will require 6 doublings of traffic. In the past each doubling has required 18 months, up until the a.s.pictures nonsense hit us. Reaching 1G/day should then take somewhere between 3 and 10 years, depending on whether the volume curve is really increasing. -- <- David Herron, an MMDF & WIN/MHS guy, <- <- <- "MS-DOS? Where we're going we don't need MS-DOS." --Back To The Future