Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ncar!gatech!mcnc!duke!neuro!tbd From: tbd@neuro (Tristan Davies) Newsgroups: sci.bio Subject: Re: C. elegans Message-ID: <22455@duke.cs.duke.edu> Date: 27 Jun 91 15:49:57 GMT References: <51261@ut-emx.uucp> Sender: news@duke.cs.duke.edu Reply-To: tbd@neuro.duke.edu (Tristan Davies) Distribution: na Organization: Dept. of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center Lines: 57 Nntp-Posting-Host: neuro.neuro.duke.edu In article <51261@ut-emx.uucp> bill@dorrit.as.utexas.edu writes: >I just wanted to alert people to an interesting >article on C. elegans in the latest _Science_ >(v. 252, pp. 1619-20, 21 June 1991). Main points: > > A group at Washington University is well along > in sequencing the entire genome (goal: done by > the year 2000). Some interesting surprises. > > The 302-neuron nervous system of this organism > shows some surprising capabilities to learn. > > C. elegans may be useful in constructing useful > bioassays for toxicology, environmental > contaminants, and other purposes. > >Bill Jefferys Actually, the effort to understand C. elegans has been underway since 1963, when Sydney Brenner (at the MRC in Cambridge, England) decided that with a small animal like C. elegans, it should be possible to unravel the details of its existence. One of the first areas to be expolored was the nervous system, which was painstakingly reconstructed in its entirety from serial electron microscopic sections (think about how difficult that was!!). The idea: if we can identify every neuron and the connections it makes, we should be able to understand how this nervous system guided the behavior of the animal, from input to output. So far, I'm not sure whether this has really happened. I imagine that behaviors aren't quite so easy to understand. Another valuable area of research on the C. elegans nervous system has been cell death. As far as I can tell, it was in C. elegans that researchers first realized that some cells are fated to die during the natural course of development. I imagine that the C. elegans genome project will run into some of the same problems as the above-mentioned nervous system reconstructions; just because you have all the pieces doesn't mean you can solve the puzzle. This project's success should also be interesting in rerlatiojn to the human genome project. If sequencing C. elegans' genome doesn`t lead to a complete understanding of that animal, how can we expect the human genome project to be very useful for understanding humans? FYI, a lot of the facts in this post come from another interesting article: "The Worm Project," Science vol. 248, p.1310, 15 June 1990. By the way, has there been much discussion of the human Genome Project in this group? If not, how about starting one? Happy trails! Tristan "don't ask me. I'm just a worm" Davies e-mail: tbd@neuro.duke.edu Department of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center grblb blabt unt mipt speeb!! oot piffoo blaboo..." -- Opus