Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!lll-winken!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!emory!tridom!atssc!fang!att!att!cbnews!cbnews!military
From: carroll@cs.uiuc.edu (Alan M. Carroll)
Newsgroups: sci.military
Subject: Re: Re: Combat MOS for Women ?
Message-ID: <1991Jun27.022123.5565@cbnews.cb.att.com>
Date: 27 Jun 91 02:21:23 GMT
References: <1991Jun25.024626.27716@cbnews.cb.att.com>
Sender: military@cbnews.cb.att.com (william.a.thacker)
Organization: Technophiles Inc. - Engineers with Attitude
Lines: 19
Approved: military@att.att.com



From: carroll@cs.uiuc.edu (Alan M. Carroll)
In article <1991Jun25.024626.27716@cbnews.cb.att.com>, paj@gec-mrc.co.uk (paj) writes:
> The Royal Navy is now putting WRENs (female officers) on combat ships.  Some
> served in the Gulf.
> 
> Recently a WREN and a male officer were court-martialled for "conduct
> predjudicial to good discipline".  They had been found naked in her cabin.

On a related subject that was touched on by some other posts, does
anyone have any solid information on pregnancies / annum for females
in the various armed forces? I thought I remembered that this was a
real problem in the US Navy, but I could be mistaken.

-- 
Alan M. Carroll          <-- Another casualty of applied metaphysics
Epoch Development Team   
Urbana Il.               "I hate shopping with the reality-impaired" - Susan