From: utzoo!decvax!harpo!ihps3!ixn5c!inuxc!inuxd!aka779
Newsgroups: net.sf-lovers
Title: 2010: Odyssey Two, by Arthur C. ?Clarke
Article-I.D.: inuxd.197
Posted: Mon Nov  1 22:45:13 1982
Received: Tue Nov  2 06:57:32 1982

Just read the above book this last weekend, and found it to be  good.

Probably not great, but good.  A very reasonable sequel to the MOVIE
version: explanations of HAL's behavior, some insight on the Star
Person, and ...  Well, I suggest y'all read it.

I'd like to see other comments, but I think this is good SF, and
certainly an order of magnitude better than Foundations Ragged Edges

Any others feel this way?  Different?  
Of the last three books, the prior mentioned and Friday, by RAH, 
this is the only one I've liked, at all.  Seems only ACC has kept=
his sense of what SF is.  Asimov did it for the $$, and why RAH did
it, I don't know.  Certainly was not a story, just a series of vignettes.

--Arlan Andrews, Indy