From: utzoo!decvax!microsof!uw-beave!uw-june!igloo
Newsgroups: net.singles
Title: !rabbit!jj's decision NOT to respond
Article-I.D.: uw-june.187
Posted: Fri Nov 12 16:18:56 1982
Received: Mon Nov 15 06:44:49 1982


So you choose NOT to reply, !jj?  That's fine, but don't you realize 
that broadcasting this choice obviously constitutes a reply?  
                 
What you are trying to claim is that you are above the level of
discussion you have brought me down to...and at the same time
get the last word in.  It appears to me that you are no more
capable of NOT responding intelligently than you are of responding
intelligently!

This concludes my childish attempt to get the last word in.  Let's pursue
this privately, if you insist.  [I'm even willing to pipe your responses 
through SPELL.]

                     Very truly yours,

                            Jeff Norman
          

PS  I think you meant to inquire about my "counsel", not my
"council".

I APOLOGIZE TO NET.SINGLES READERS WHO HAVE UNDERSTANDABLY
FOUND THIS ENTIRE DISCUSSION TEDIOUS.  IT'S BEEN FUN FOR ME.