From: utzoo!decvax!cca!gwyn@Brl@sri-unix Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards Title: Re: csv versus csav Article-I.D.: sri-unix.4398 Posted: Thu Nov 25 05:46:28 1982 Received: Fri Nov 26 02:10:36 1982 From: Doug Gwyn Date: 24 Nov 82 18:05:12-EST (Wed) The relative speed of csv and csav is processor-dependent. It does appear that on most processors csv would be a tiny bit faster. My guess is that the "tst -(sp)" in csav to obtain an extra scratch cell on the top of the stack was added after the original timing measurements, since without this instruction csav is definitely faster. The interrupt problem csav was supposed to solve involves having a signal interrupt the csv sequence, then a longjmp() performed by the signal catcher. I haven't traced through the sequence of events involved, though.