From: utzoo!decvax!cca!gwyn@Brl@sri-unix
Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards
Title: Re:  Information on Unix/Vax peculiarities
Article-I.D.: sri-unix.4511
Posted: Tue Nov 30 18:23:34 1982
Received: Wed Dec  1 08:49:47 1982

From:     Doug Gwyn <gwyn@Brl>
Date:     29 Nov 82 13:37:50-EST (Mon)
I have used machines on which a (char *) cannot possibly fit into an (int).

I am curious whether anyone has ever found a case in which (char *) is not
the "fattest" pointer type.  I generally assume it is, so I would like to
hear if this isn't always true.  Thanks...