From: utzoo!decvax!ucbvax!info-vax Newsgroups: fa.info-vax Title: Laser printers Article-I.D.: ucbvax.218 Posted: Sat Dec 4 16:45:46 1982 Received: Sun Dec 5 09:14:15 1982 >From Odonnell@YALE Sat Dec 4 16:25:59 1982 Mail-From: ARPANET host SANDIA rcvd at 29-Nov-82 1048-PST Mail-From: ARPANET site YALE rcvd at 29-Nov-82 1145-MST To: info-vax@SANDIA Remailed-Date: 4 Dec 1982 1047-PST Remailed-From: the tty of Geoffrey S. Goodfellow Remailed-To: Info-VAX@SRI-CSL: ; I feel obliged to respond to Brian Reid's excellent, informative article on laser printers. We have had an Imagen Imprint-10 in service at Yale since early January. To date it has printed over 150,000 pages with no problems. We produce output using Scribe, troff, and TEX. The printer is interfaced to a VAX over a 9600 baud line at present; the VAX acts as a server to the rest of our Ethernet. We expect to switch to direct Ethernet communication when that becomes available. Their Centronics interface is available now. The release of general-purpose graphics (vectors, textures, and screen dumps) is imminent, we are told. The reports of prolonged problems are hard to understand. While we've done a lot of work on the host side (page reversal, font downloading optimization), we're still running the controller firmware delivered in January with no significant troubles; our only complaint is the limited (metafont) font library. The Canon is a reasonable marking engine; for those who care about large formats, it will handle larger sheets than the Xerox unit. It has never failed, and the initial image adjustment procedure has never required repetition; image quality stays consistently high. 240 dpi is a limitation, all will agree; but our output looks better than a lot of higher-resolution output from poorly adjusted printers. We plan to buy two more units shortly, and Imagen leads our list of suppliers at present. QMS has yet to send us literature after repeated requests; does anyone have their printer? I'd like to hear from those who have comparable experience with the Symbolics printer. To sum up: Our experience with Imagen has been good, and they seem to be continuing to produce good stuff (a complete rewrite of their controller firmware is being completed now; they say it will be the base for lots of extended functionality). -------