From: utzoo!decvax!decwrl!sun!megatest!fortune!hpda!ld Newsgroups: net.followup Title: Re: people who need mail paths - (~nf) Article-I.D.: hpda.380 Posted: Fri Mar 25 12:46:01 1983 Received: Sun Mar 27 06:08:12 1983 Wake up friends. Some guy just said that some sites carry the bulk of netnews traffic. He mentioned decvax and ucbvax. Maybe DEC has a couple of USENET machines, maybe UCB has a dozen. Uhm, excuse me. There's this company called Bell Telephone Laboratories which has HUNDREDS of machines on the net, and BTL forwards more mail and news than even (!) decvax. By far. I don't want to hear some college kid saying "why shouldn't they, it's all telco revenue anyway?" Telco revenue doesn't get credited to our BTL organizations, but our telephone bills get taken out of BTL budgets. Maybe I'm a little crabby this early in the morning, but I just can't understand how senseless some people can be. Andy Tannenbaum Bell Labs Whippany, NJ (201) 386-6491 Sorry Andy, BTL may forward more news and mail than any other en- tity, but it appears to be forwarding only within Ma-Bell. Of course this would be true, since there are more Bell sites than outsiders. But then, installing a new Bell site do not cost real licensing fees (hence the proliferation) and they have been in- stalling sites longer than any other group. When the statement was made that `some sites carry the bulk of netnews traffic', he was referring to carrying it long distance (expensive phone charges). I extracted all the `From:' lines in net.general (we keep files 2 weeks) and did a little massaging to see who sends news across the US. Here are the results: articles connection 29 decwrl!decvax 4 hplabs!hao* 14 hplabs!hao!seismo 11 sri-unix!cca 4 ucbvax:decvax *I included this connection because it represents a connection between the western 1/3 of the US. Of course, I am biased, so take it with a grain of salt. I happen to know that there is a major WE site in Denver. While it is true that BTL may be spending a fortune mailing to it- self, we in the real world do not particularly care what it's internal financial difficulties are. I will not bore you with HP's internal cost transfers (often called funny money). It is not a matter of how many machines are forwarding news, it is a matter of how far any single jump is. Of course it costs the Bell System money even for them to make a long distance call (they cannot generate `real' revenue on the line if it is in use by Bell). So it is hardly fair to say that they have the equipment to make free cross country connections. However ... they are in a position to prod their communication en- gineers to solve the problem of making data transfer more cost ef- fective by improving the performance of their system and (heaven forbid) lowering the long distance tariffs. This does not mean that they can EASILY convince the engineers to make such a change, I know how burocracies are. It just means that they are in a BETTER position than I am (or any other non-Bell person). Thanks for reading my senseless babble, Larry Dwyer Hewlett Packard Co. ucbvax!hpda!ld PS: Thank you DEC for decwrl!decvax.