From: utzoo!decvax!ucbvax!ucbcad:tektronix!zehntel!sytek!menlo70!hao!seismo!rocheste!FtG
Newsgroups: net.religion
Title: Re: Jesus the non-divine teacher
Article-I.D.: rocheste.1094
Posted: Mon Mar 28 08:10:11 1983
Received: Thu Mar 31 04:12:31 1983
References: dadla-b.396

dadla-b!hutch should learn how to read. Period. read the original article
and my response first before accusing me of somehting I did not do.

1. The original article attempted to impose the author's particle narrow
view as the BASIS of debate. The usual "anyone who doesn't believe in
doing it MY way goes to hell" implication was clear.

2. My response pointed out that there are hundreds of millions of people
who don't view it that way. The main example was the Moslems. I was in
no way defending the Moslem viewpoint, MERELY (hold to your seats) THEIR
RIGHT TO HOLD IT.

It is one thing to critisize another's view, it is something else entirely
to deny them their right to have it. If you don't like other's religions-
tough. It is this imposition of a narrow view by "fundamentalists" that
is making so many people so very nervous.
				FtG
p.s. to dadla-b!hutch: I have never gone by the first name "mister".