From: utzoo!decvax!harpo!eagle!mhtsa!alice!npoiv!eisx!pyuxll!abnjh!lute
Newsgroups: net.singles
Title: Another place to meet MOTOS
Article-I.D.: abnjh.124
Posted: Tue Apr  5 12:24:13 1983
Received: Wed Apr  6 05:51:15 1983



I have noticed something very interesting recently.  If you go out to lunch
at a nice restaraunt you will find an abundance of MOTOS at the bar and at
tables.  Since I am a man, I address this more to the male readers of this
news group, but women can find MOTOS for themselves there, too.

Many of the women that go out to lunch in restaraunts in corporate areas
tend to be intelligent, attractive, well-dressed and articulate (gauging
from conversations I have overheard).  The only problem I have noted is
that I tend to see a few more wedding rings on their fingers, but there
is a trade-off to everything in life (sigh!).  Please understand, however,
that there are still a good number of women WITHOUT wedding rings in these
lunchtime groups.  It is just that there APPEARS to be a higher mix of
married women in these groups, also.

Also, these same places, RIGHT AFTER WORK, seem to attract similar types of
women.  However, people seem to change to the singles bar behavior patterns
since, unlike lunch, they don't have to be ready to go back to a "serious"
environment within the hour.  So gauge your expectations, etc. accordingly.

The only problem for you now is, how do you strike up a conversation with
these intelligent, attractive, well-dressed and articulate MOTOS you see
in the resaraunt???  Well, I'd really be interested in hearing from other
readers on their suggestions, but I offer two little hints:

Men:  Make eye contact, BUT DON'T STARE!  When eye contact is made,
SMILE, but DON'T LEER!  (From here, the rest is up to you!)

Women:  If you see an interesting MOTOS, Do the same as above, make eye
contact.  When eye contact is made, SMILE, DON'T suddenly turn away
pretending to talk to your female friends, or act offended.  (From here,
the rest is up to you, too.)

Anyone else have anything to add to the above?


					Jim Collymore