From: utzoo!decvax!harpo!floyd!vax135!ariel!houca!hogpc!houxm!mhuxa!mhuxj!mhuxt!mhuxh!mhuxi!macrev Newsgroups: net.aviation Title: Sticks and Yokes Article-I.D.: mhuxi.38 Posted: Fri Apr 29 11:23:32 1983 Received: Sat Apr 30 05:58:56 1983 I've been watching the stick/yoke discussion with some interest, and I'd like to comment and perhaps add a new dimension. I'm not a pilot, but I did spend a lot of years keeping flight simulators running, and you might say I've "flown" many different types of aircraft. I cannot comment on yokes in small, private aircraft -- perhaps they have them for comfort, as someone has suggested. Big aircraft however, have a practical need for a yoke -- there are times when they must be literally wrestled into control. Sometimes the combined efforts of the pilot and copilot are needed. Sticks are one-handed controls -- yokes provide two-handed control. Even with hydraulically- assisted control surfaces, the control loading (the artificial feedback the pilot feels as he moves the yoke or rudder pedals) can be tremendous. In fighter aircraft, the stick is low and between the knees. One hand is on the stick, and the other does the things a copilot, and engineer, a navigator, a gunner, or an EWO would do on a larger airplane. In some fighter aircraft, only the grip portion of the stick moves, and the aircraft is controlled by very small movements of the wrist. Control loading is all but done away with -- the pilot has no trouble moving his control surfaces even at very high speeds. So much for the practical reasons for sticks and yokes in military aircraft. Now I have a question for you glider pilots -- Is there enough room in your cockpits for a yoke? They generally require more forward and backward travel than a stick. They're also heavier. And wider. And I would guess that the linkage would be a little more complicated than that of a stick. -- Mike Lynch BTL Short Hills, NJ mhuxi!macrev