From: utzoo!decvax!decwrl!sun!megatest!fortune!hpda!hplabs!hao!seismo!harpo!eagle!mhtsa!alice!npoiv!houxm!houxz!halle1
Newsgroups: net.movies
Title: 3-D Movies
Article-I.D.: houxz.300
Posted: Tue May 10 16:08:50 1983
Received: Sat May 14 02:46:57 1983

I must disagree with mhuxt!hstrop.  There have been 3-D movies since House
of Wax that have been decent.  All of them have been Cinerama.  You remember
them, the huge wrap-around screen and the three cameras.  Windjammer wasn't
bad (it was the first) and I enjoyed The Brothers Grimm (of course I was
rather young at the time).  I suspect that it didn't last because it was
horrendously expensive, what with extra screens and three times the camera
work and film.  The Cinerama movies were much better technically than all
the other attempts, and didn't give you headaches.