From: utzoo!decvax!harpo!floyd!vax135!ariel!hou5f!hou5b!hou5c!hou5e!mat Newsgroups: net.physics Title: Re: Speed of Light Question? Article-I.D.: hou5e.433 Posted: Fri Apr 29 13:14:48 1983 Received: Sat Apr 30 04:17:14 1983 References: inuxc.652 Well, if the speed of light were increased, then a lot of things related to electromagnetism would have to change also. Thie first example that comes to mind is this little relationship: ____1____ c = ________________ v/ u * e 0 0 where e is an epsilon, and u is a mu. In other words, the inverse of the square root of the product of the permeability and permittivity of free space equals the speed of light ( actually electromagnetic propagation ) in free space. Since the permeability and permittitivity of free space influence directly bulk inductance and capacitance fo free space, and since materials tend to track the free-space values within a few orders of magnitude, we might have to build a lot of our machines differently. In addition, since c = f * (lambda) where lambda is wavelength and f is frequency, we would find a lot of our optical systems fouled up. (This is not unrelated to the permeability/ permittivity question). Now we have screwed up the photo-electric effect, and we will have to tinker with Plank's constant to make it all work again. After that, I believe, we might have to revise Boltzman's constant to meke (statistical) chemistry work out again. From there, it is a short step to the Reynold's number for the various types of flow, and I can eventually see a devaluation of the dollar, the franc, and the pound against the ruble. No, we had better leave ``c'' alone. Seen in a men's room: and God said: ________________________ / \ / Insert Maxwell's \ / equations in differential \ | form here, along with the | \ required continutity eq- / \ uations in the matching/ \ form. / \_____________________/ AND THERE WAS LIGHT Mark Terribile Duke of DeNet -!hou5e!mat