From: utzoo!decvax!harpo!floyd!vax135!cornell!wally
Newsgroups: net.rec.photo
Title: Re: Kodak VR 1000 film - (nf)
Article-I.D.: cornell.4362
Posted: Fri Apr 29 10:08:10 1983
Received: Mon May  2 01:58:49 1983
References: uiucdcs.1985

This is in response to the article that said pictures in low temp. tungsten
light turned out bad but ones taken in high temp light turned out fine.


I don't know the difference between high and low temp. tungsten, but I do
know VR 1000 was designed for daylight.  A Pop Photo review said that VR 1000
didn't have the color range to take pictures in tungsten light and allow
for color correction in printing.  They said that VR 100 and VR 200, which
will come out later this year, will be much better in that respect.