From: utzoo!decvax!genrad!linus!philabs!sdcsvax!sdccsu3!sdcrdcf!mike Newsgroups: net.sf-lovers Title: Re: V on TV.... Article-I.D.: sdcrdcf.250 Posted: Wed May 11 11:41:20 1983 Received: Fri May 13 20:58:34 1983 Reply-To: mike@sdcrdcf.UUCP (Michael Williams) References: <758@pur-phy.UUCP> <239@sdcrdcf.UUCP> Being one who tries to see all sides of an issue, I thought about "V" trying to come up with a way to like it. I finally came across an idea which I think allows me to have some respect for it. If you view the show strictly as a suspension of reality and science, rather than an extension thereof, it begins to make some sense. For example, when you watch Superman you don't groan when he spins the Earth the other way to give Lois a second chance. You've suspended your requirements for the Man of Steel to obey currently understood laws of Nature. (If you're is a real die hard, I suppose you do groan, or try to rationalize the phenomena in some way). The writers of "V" made it quite clear in the credits and their advertizing that the whole concept was decidedly allegorical. Perhaps their constant violations of "common sense" seemed just plausible enough to be interpreted as attempts at reality, rather than fantasy. Or maybe the manner in which bogus things occured was not quite "fantastic" enough to convince us that we should let go of physics and biology, and concentrate on psychology and morality. It seemed to me that the director took care during the scenes where humanane values were being degraded, and glossed over the action and adventure aspects. The filming (jolting cuts to various profile shots) during the scene where the son who joined the Visitors youth gang phones headquarters to find that he has been betrayed (lied to) was particularly effective. Well, sorry for the diatribe. Just thought that viewed from certain angles, the show had merit. Mike Williams UUCP: randvax!sdcrdcf!mike burdvax!sdcrdcf!mike ucla-vax!sdcrdcf!mike cbosgd!sdcrdcf!mike ihnss!sdcrdcf!mike