From: utzoo!watmath!watarts!geo Newsgroups: net.space Title: Re: Hot Light or Hot Air? Article-I.D.: watarts.1809 Posted: Tue May 3 18:48:20 1983 Received: Wed May 4 00:22:28 1983 Reply-To: geo@watarts.uucp (Geo Swan) References: populi.561 In his origninal article (populi.561) John Hevelin quotes the December 1981 Sci Am article on DEW (directed energy weapons), by Kosta Tsipsis. He praises the article, and asks if anyone knows any reason why this should not be considered the last word on fry in the sky laser beams. I also found this a very good article, and I would have considered it the latest word until I read an article in fa.arms-d a couple of months ago. The article described a new scheme someone had dreamed up. The weapon consisted of a hydrogen bomb surrounded by rods that lased in the X-ray frequencies. The rods were to be steerable, when many of them were pointing at ICBMs the bomb was supposed to go off, pulsing the rods and stimulating them to lase, thus zapping the missiles. (Remember ruby lasers? They were pulsed lasers.) I forget what percentage of the energy released by the explosion was supposed to be transmitted by the lasers. I recall it was a fairly large fraction. Tsipsis did not mention these devices. Cordially, Geo Swan, Integrated Studies, University of Waterloo (allegra|decvax) !watmath!watarts!geo