Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site rabbit.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!floyd!whuxlb!pyuxll!eisx!npoiv!npois!hogpc!houxm!hocda!spanky!burl!we13!ihnp4!cbosgd!mhuxi!mhuxt!eagle!alice!rabbit!jj From: jj@rabbit.UUCP Newsgroups: net.audio Subject: superstition--wishes were horses night. Message-ID: <1761@rabbit.UUCP> Date: Thu, 4-Aug-83 17:04:58 EDT Article-I.D.: rabbit.1761 Posted: Thu Aug 4 17:04:58 1983 Date-Received: Sat, 6-Aug-83 17:35:24 EDT Organization: Bell Labs, Murray Hill Lines: 61 Mr. K's analysis of speaker response is mostly correct, except for the assumtion that the drivers have both flat phase response (Not true, but somewhat compensatable) and flat (and resistive) impedences. IF one is using a bi-amped system, AND has an extremely good set of drivers that have their phase responses MATCHED over the crossover region, (note, matched, not flat) then the statements made about first order crossovers will hold. IF one is using passive crossovers, which was the case under discussion, then one must also take into account the impedence of the driver, typically nothing near either resistive nor of flat magnitude. Woofers tend to lag by 45-90 degrees near the top of their useful range, tweeters to lead by a similar amount (unless one is close to the tweeter resonance, in which case all bets are off), leading to a considerable difference from the expected response. This phase shift must be 1) Known in advance. 2) The crossover points must be offset to account for the diffence. and 3) The tweeter must (occasionally) be connected out of phase to allow even approximate matching. In the case of second order crossovers, several other effects happen, i.e. the q and frequency of the crossover point are severely affected by the driver impedence, thus leading to considerably more trouble, unless one makes the appropriate allowances.