Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utcsrgv.UUCP Path: utzoo!utcsrgv!peterr From: peterr@utcsrgv.UUCP (Peter Rowley) Newsgroups: net.cog-eng Subject: Reply to "Are we designing for the users...?" Message-ID: <2049@utcsrgv.UUCP> Date: Mon, 22-Aug-83 13:31:24 EDT Article-I.D.: utcsrgv.2049 Posted: Mon Aug 22 13:31:24 1983 Date-Received: Mon, 22-Aug-83 17:17:13 EDT Organization: CSRG, University of Toronto Lines: 26 There are at least two problems that cog-eng can address, the software crisis (by designing tools for programmers that allow them to better construct and understand complicated software) and making computers usable by novices (by designing systems that lead complete novices to proficiency in simple domains such as letter writing and home budget keeping). The two problems are intuitively very different, with experts working in a rather open-ended domain in the first, and novices-becoming-experts in a limited domain in the second. But those "novices" are often highly skilled professionals. And the experts have the same basic genetic structures as the novices. I think that there are so many questions and assumptions to be resolved that it is too early to label research as SOLELY "novice" or "expert" oriented. However, specific projects WILL deal with either simple domains or complicated domains such as programming. On the basis of social need, I'd say study of novices is pretty important to the spread of computers. But providing better software tools is important for the construction of software, especially life-critical software (e.g. air traffic control, reactor control). My impression is that work with novices is far more prevalent, in no small part due to the fact that novices are far more prevalent than experts. But who's to say which area is ultimately more important? peter rowley, University of Toronto Department of C.S., Ontario Canada M5S 1A4 {cornell,watmath,ihnp4,floyd,allegra,ubc-vision,uw-beaver}!utcsrgv!peterr {cwruecmp,duke,linus,decvax,research}!utzoo!utcsrgv!peterr