Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utcsstat.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcsstat!laura
From: laura@utcsstat.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.flame
Subject: Re: reply to ** FRODO ** from laura
Message-ID: <880@utcsstat.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 15-Aug-83 16:52:22 EDT
Article-I.D.: utcsstat.880
Posted: Mon Aug 15 16:52:22 1983
Date-Received: Mon, 15-Aug-83 17:48:56 EDT
References: <854@utcsstat.UUCP>, <358@hou5f.UUCP>
Organization: U. of Toronto, Canada
Lines: 14

no, FRODO, Tim and I are not related. I have the distinct impression
that when we were shopping for morality we spent a lot of time at
the same stores, and got this terrific deal ... that's all.

you miss my point. You want to ban smoking because you find it
offensive, right? Suppose I find computers offensive. Do I get
to ban them? Suppose I find Blacks offensive. Do I get to ban
them too? I gather, from your last article that you do not think
I should get to ban Blacks. What I want to know is what mechanism
you have for stopping me? How do you prevent injustice in a society
where 'likes' and 'dislikes' are sufficient grounds for legislation?

Laura Creighton
utzoo!utcsstat!laura