Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site hp-pcd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!seismo!hao!hplabs!hp-pcd!decvax!goutal
From: goutal@decvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.games.frp
Subject: Re: Orphaned Response - (nf)
Message-ID: <1742@hp-pcd.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 4-Sep-83 03:41:33 EDT
Article-I.D.: hp-pcd.1742
Posted: Sun Sep  4 03:41:33 1983
Date-Received: Mon, 5-Sep-83 21:02:58 EDT
Sender: netnews@hp-pcd.UUCP
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Corvallis OR
Lines: 12

#R:decvax:0:decvax:-15201:37777777600:394
decvax!goutal    Aug  1 19:51:00 1983

About initiative between the plate-armored fella with the 2H sword
versus the leatherjacket with the dagger --
seems like the Encumbrance concept could handle this quite well, too.
As I am at the office at the moment, I can't check my manuals,
so I don't remember if AD&D even *has* encumbrance,
nor if Runequest uses encumbrance in determining initiative.
Just a thot.
-- Kenn (decvax!goutal)