Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site qubix.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!decwrl!qubix!lab
From: lab@qubix.UUCP (Larry Bickford)
Newsgroups: net.legal
Subject: Re: Twisting the legal system
Message-ID: <465@qubix.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 30-Aug-83 15:25:02 EDT
Article-I.D.: qubix.465
Posted: Tue Aug 30 15:25:02 1983
Date-Received: Wed, 31-Aug-83 23:30:49 EDT
References: <462@spanky.UUCP>
Organization: Qubix Graphic Systems, Saratoga, CA
Lines: 20

Here we go again, confusing statement of law with punishment to be
associated with it:

* It seems to me that if you are opposed to the effects of a law
* you should come right out and advocate changing the law.  If you
* want illegally collected evidence to be introduced in court, you
* should advocate the modification or repeal of the fourth
* amendment; otherwise where would you be if policemen stopped
* violating the fourth amendment?	
*					Kenneth	Almquist

Again, Fourth Amendment states that a given act is wrong. It does
NOT (repeat NOT) state the punishment for the crime. I have yet to
find written in any law in the United States of America that
violation of the Fourth Amendment by one side to a case gives
freedom to the other side. If the evidence was illegally COLLECTED
(not illegal of itself), PUNISH THE COLLECTOR!

"Count on me to rehash it again until it's understood"
Larry Bickford, {ihnp4,ucbvax,decvax}!decwrl!qubix!lab