Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/26/83; site ihuxm.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!floyd!whuxlb!pyuxll!eisx!npoiv!npois!hogpc!houxm!ihnp4!ihuxm!bryan
From: bryan@ihuxm.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.legal
Subject: Re: Cokes the real thing
Message-ID: <504@ihuxm.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 31-Aug-83 17:51:41 EDT
Article-I.D.: ihuxm.504
Posted: Wed Aug 31 17:51:41 1983
Date-Received: Thu, 1-Sep-83 07:21:35 EDT
Organization: BTL Naperville, Il.
Lines: 20

Yes if you order Rum and Coke you better get Coke and not
another brand. When I worked for Pizza Hut which is a
division of Pepico they were fanatical about being sure
to let the customer know "we don't serve Coke". Actually I
don't thing Coca-cola really cares but, by law, they must
activily protect their trademark or loose it!

P.S. Any body realy look at a Coke can ant notice that the
trade mark does not say Coca Cola but Cocai Cola ?
This is left over from the orignal formula for the drink
which did include a small amount of Cocaine. Look at some
of the very early adds. Of course today cocaine has be replaced
by cafine. 

*Coke, Coca-Cola, are trade marks of Coca-Cola
*Pizza Hut is a trade mark of Pepico

			ihuxf!bryan
			Bryan DeLaney