Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utcsstat.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcsstat!laura
From: laura@utcsstat.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.misc
Subject: Re: Proof of astrology?
Message-ID: <886@utcsstat.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 16-Aug-83 12:18:47 EDT
Article-I.D.: utcsstat.886
Posted: Tue Aug 16 12:18:47 1983
Date-Received: Tue, 16-Aug-83 22:19:28 EDT
References: <2360@csu-cs.UUCP>, <371@gatech.UUCP>
Organization: U. of Toronto, Canada
Lines: 8

i haven't seen any convincing proof of astrology, but the logic of
'more twins should be conceived, not born, under gemini" escapes me.
net.jokes is still full of jokes even when they are rot(13)'d,
should not astrology not be full of whatever it is supposed to be full
of even if you need to interpret the results rot(9)?

Laura Creighton
utzoo!utcsstat!laura