Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/26/83; site ihuxl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!tektronix!uw-beaver!cornell!vax135!ariel!hou5f!hou5g!hou5h!eagle!mhuxt!mhuxi!mhuxa!houxm!ihnp4!ihuxl!messina
From: messina@ihuxl.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.music
Subject: studios
Message-ID: <518@ihuxl.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 28-Aug-83 15:57:12 EDT
Article-I.D.: ihuxl.518
Posted: Sun Aug 28 15:57:12 1983
Date-Received: Mon, 29-Aug-83 14:57:59 EDT
Organization: BTL Naperville, Il.
Lines: 24

OK maybe i got carried away when i said a 4 track can sound just as 
good as a 32 track recording.  One could tell the difference if it
was brought to their attention, but when someone hears a recording that
does not sound quite so good, they don't think to themselves, "Damn
this record was recorded in a 4 track studio, those *&^%%$", they 
usually think it sounds bad for some other reason.
My point was you can get a good recording off of a 4 track system and
it will not be that noticable, if at all.
When the beatles were recording back in the 60's, most of the records
sounded like sh*t anyways, but again the sterios where not that fantastic
either, it was a big thing to have sterio back then.
Analogy: back in 1930 why use colorful sceens, costumes, and lighting
effects when the show is going to be filmed in B&W anyways ?

I can see using multi track studios today because the average person
usually owns a sterio that's halfway good, and good sound quality
is in a high demand.


Lets get more conversation going here !!
So voice(type) your opinion, talk about music, else
why have net.music.

		ihuxl!messina