Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/26/83; site ihopa.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!eagle!hou5h!hou5a!hou5d!hogpc!houxm!ihnp4!ihopa!burris From: burris@ihopa.UUCP Newsgroups: net.music Subject: Re: studios Message-ID: <105@ihopa.UUCP> Date: Wed, 31-Aug-83 10:57:23 EDT Article-I.D.: ihopa.105 Posted: Wed Aug 31 10:57:23 1983 Date-Received: Thu, 1-Sep-83 04:53:08 EDT References: <200@FLAIRMAX.UUCP> Organization: BTL Naperville, Il. Lines: 33 Well, once again I find myself about to jump into the same argument about multi-track as discussed months ago. You (FLAIRMAX!ellis) may consider a mullti-track recorder to be high-tech elitist but I would ask you to consider that if there were not a GOOD reason to develop them they would not exist if for no other reason than expense. To make such a rediculous statement which suggests that multi-track users forego the artistry is at best uninformed superstition. The artistry of a particular piece either exists or not independant of the recording technology. The advancement of the technology has in fact opened the doorway to creativity by providing an expanded repertoire of possible sounds and effects to chose from. The fact that some musicians fail to select a combination of sounds which appears to be artistic is completely independant of the technology. The sophistication of consumers of music has increased substantially in the last few years. The playback equipment and the expectations of the listeners have reached a point that it is near impossible to produce an acceptable result with a four-track machine. I am speaking here of popular music so all you two-mike-audiophile-type classical listeners curtail your flames, ok! There is another factor to support multi-track usage in major album projects; sometimes a group of musicians may lay down some excellent tracks which they decide are a take. But for economic or scheduling reasons the side-men (such as the Earth, Wind & Fire horn section) must perform at a later date. Multi-track recording allows the luxury of adding these tracks without disturbing the originals. Also, suppose the artist has what was originally considered a finished product and decides that an oboe part should be added to spice up a particular section of the piece. Would you prefer to have a totally seperate track or to add noise doing an overdub? Dave Burris ihopa!burris BTL - Naperville