Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site utcsstat.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcsrgv!utcsstat!laura
From: laura@utcsstat.UUCP (Laura Creighton)
Newsgroups: net.philosophy
Subject: Re: mysticism revisited
Message-ID: <934@utcsstat.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 21-Aug-83 19:32:22 EDT
Article-I.D.: utcsstat.934
Posted: Sun Aug 21 19:32:22 1983
Date-Received: Sun, 21-Aug-83 21:03:20 EDT
References: <896@utcsstat.UUCP>, <1042@uwvax.ARPA>
Organization: U. of Toronto, Canada
Lines: 12

If you posit a non-mystical solution to where does intuition come from
(actually, mysticism is very complex, and it is misleading to talk about
"the one true mystical solution") does it help? If I am still dependant
on all the crud in my subconcsious making its way to the surface at
FTL speeds, can I be rational? How can i build a model of all the
stuff in my subconscious? Even *exploring* it is difficult! Do i have
to wait for revalation? What if it never comes? How is this revalation 
different from "standard mystical revalation" in terms of the ability to
act rationally?

laura creighton
utzoo!utcsstat!laura